Friday, February 28, 2020

Farming the taxpayers: The wind industry's cash cow

If the federal government offered billions of dollars in tax credits and other incentives to promote the stacking of Oreo cookies all the way up to the International Space Station, rich companies would line up to gobble the goodies –  and taxpayers would have to supply the milk.

And that 254-mile high column of cookies would be just about as practical as the billions pumped into the U.S. wind industry.

After all, the same type of fruitless dynamic has monetized corporate wind, which continues its race to force the 30,000 acre on-again, off-again industrial power plants down the throats of property owners and rural residents in Kansas and elsewhere in the country. The delicious addiction of tax incentives and outright subsidies has seen Big Wind grow fat without the pestering of logical accountability. Wind incentives indeed have been a cash cow so humongous only the federal government's barn can hold it.

That cow's been growing. Wind power has certainly expanded in "sometimes" capacity in recent years as the divisive developments have invaded rural communities, offering pittance lease payments to poor farmers and landowners suffering in ag economies beset by low commodity prices. But that growth's not been driven by market demand, since the market knows the only good electricity is electricity that always works. It's been driven instead by billions of dollars of taxpayer money.

The scheme is perhaps best illustrated with one question asked by each community in Kansas fighting the invasion of a taxpayer-funded wind development: Why are there no wind farms in Johnson County?

Most Americans are in the dark as to the detailed mechanics which have been used to fund the development of faulty wind power and the raw, massive bill they're footing in the form of those incentives. That scheme is designed to support an energy industry that can't and will never support itself with its own production in the market for electricity. It's a complicated array of local, state and federal subsidies, federal loans and loan guarantees which has topped $176 billion since 2000 – and most of the federal grants have been awarded since 2007.

There's no question of the chicken or the egg here. Without those subsidies and the generosity of the American taxpayer in opening his wallet for outright cash and his pledge to pay the income taxes for huge companies which escape them through production tax credits, there would be no wind industry in the United States. People in rural communities would still all be speaking to each other instead of being at odds over the giant turbines, and beautiful rural vistas across our country would still be intact instead of resembling science fiction movies.

General Electric, NextEra Energy, Berkshire-Hathaway and others – these massively wealthy companies have been the real winners in the fakery that has always defined the wind industry. The scam is clear – the environment hasn't benefited a whit with the spread of these monstrosities across our pristine rural landscapes, since stable electricity still has to be generated by conventional means to power your household when the wind doesn't blow. The only winners have been the already fabulously rich companies – both domestic and foreign – who've feathered their nests with taxpayer money and kept a willing U.S. Congress on their side.

Case in point, the Production Tax Credit – the gold mine of the wind industry that forgives taxes based on the sporadic output of the turbines – was set to expire with the coming of 2020. Its initial authors thought the industry should be self sufficient by now and ratcheted down the candy for the industry over the past several years with the intent of closing the incentive out by 2020. But at the last minute, in the glob of a temporary federal spending bill that took the place of an actual budget in December 2019, a Democrat-led congress approved the massive spending bill which conveniently rolled in a one-year extension of the tax credit for wind farms. Hence, the scourge of wind farm developers versus rural communities continues.

Famed rich guy Warren Buffet of Berkshire-Hathaway said it best in 2014 when explaining why his companies were in the wind business: "We get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms," Buffet said. "That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit."
For the rest of us the logic speaks for itself, but still we continue to pay the cookie stackers.

-Dane Hicks is publisher of The Anderson County Review in Garnett, Kan.

15 comments:

  1. Conservative estimates put U.S. direct subsidies to the fossil fuel industry at roughly $20 billion per year; with 20 percent currently allocated to coal and 80 percent to natural gas and crude oil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are no direct subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. They've been gone for decades.

      Delete
    2. Intangible Drilling Costs Deduction (26 U.S. Code § 263. Active). This provision allows companies to deduct a majority of the costs incurred from drilling new wells domestically. In its analysis of President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Proposal, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated that eliminating tax breaks for intangible drilling costs would generate $1.59 billion in revenue in 2017, or $13 billion in the next ten years.

      Delete
    3. Every business gets tax deductions for business expenses I can't believe how GD stupid some people are!

      Delete
    4. Some idiots don't know the difference between a subsidy and a deduction. (Tax break. Deduction is allowing the maker to KEEP some of his own money because of his legitimate expenses. SUBSIDY is the theft at gun point of the makers EARNED money to redistribute to the Takers to give an UNEARNED income. That is the difference between slavery and and the free market work place. (But the liberals and democrats have always been the party of slavery, so what else is new?)

      Delete
  2. Both solar and wind suffer from the same critical flaw that is never discussed. Conventional power plants need to be in standby to generate the power whenever the wind doesn't blow or the sun doesn't shine. Essentially, we have to have double the capacity. How does that make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I ask people to go look at an electric fueling station. What do you see? Oh that fenced in thing over there go take a peek. Yes it is a diesel generator there to make power for those clean electric energy cars...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I’d rather spend $15B in renewable subsidies than subsidizing the BP oil spill in the gulf.

    ReplyDelete
  5. BP oil spill was chicken feed. We spend close to $20 billion per year on renewable subsidies. Almost as the other 5 countries subsidizing renewables combined. As near as I can tell, the cleanup from the spill cost between $1.1 and $7 billion. BP is paying for that.

    The renewable subsidies are monies down the drain, wasted.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What can we do to end the subsidy to the wind? It works, but is costing us in our taxes. We need to stand up and argue for this to stop. I did not say FIGHT. That is not how we solve this. We need to implement bills in congress.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wind turbines burn out at an alarming rate.. Google the statistics and you'll soon see wind generated power is not cost effective.

      Delete
  7. Pelosi pushed this crap to make HERSELF a few MILLION along with T. Boone Pickins, who later said "it was a Boondoggle" and SOLD out before it cost HIM more money. Remember, the State and Federal Gov't contributes up to 80% for the construction of these Albatrosses. That means all a Pelosi had to put up was 20%,,then SOLD them for 80% PROFIT. Long Story Short. She NEVER said another word about how "Much she supports them". since. Nov is coming,,hopefully SHE is Plowed Under along with the other WEEDS in Congress.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If you're trying hard to lose fat then you need to start following this totally brand new personalized keto plan.

    To create this service, certified nutritionists, personal trainers, and chefs united to develop keto meal plans that are productive, suitable, economically-efficient, and enjoyable.

    Since their grand opening in 2019, 1000's of people have already transformed their figure and well-being with the benefits a certified keto plan can provide.

    Speaking of benefits: in this link, you'll discover eight scientifically-certified ones offered by the keto plan.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Some of us have always known that wind turbines are a bunch of BS. Also, we need to pull out of China entirely.

    ReplyDelete